When making changes to project documentation, almost in all cases requires re-examination, which is carried out in the same way as the first check. However, if these changes do not concern the essential characteristics of the building affecting the safety of the object, the new examination is not needed. The description of the options for making changes, as well as the procedure for their approval, can be found in the article.
Amendments to the documents for the project are permissible, and in some cases it is inevitable, since a number of documents undergo a secondary examination, which results in certain refinement. Changes in project documentation can be made in accordance with the requirements of GOST R 21.1101-2013.
Changes in project documentation can be made in accordance with the rules of this standard or in accordance with its own standards developed within the organization.
Adjusting the adjustments is allowed by the Urban Planning Code - for example, due to the deviation of object parameters from the specified indicators in the project.
After all the amendments are made, the developer must conduct an examination, on the basis of a positive solution of which the indicated changes will take effect.
However, in some cases, expertise is not carried out:
Based on this The main issue is related to whether new additions of the essential parameters of the building concernproviding its safety. Find this list of characteristics, i.e. Specific types of work, which affects the reliability of the design, can be in the relevant order of the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation.
The order describes 34 types of such works, which are grouped into 3 sections:
Based on this list, you can certainly say whether the re-examination is required to approve changes or not.
There are 2 options for making new data - this is a complete replacement of the sheet (sheets) or no replacement. The choice of a specific method remains at the discretion of the customer.
This method is used in cases where experts found quite a lot of flaws, so it is advisable not to rule each of them individually, but simply remove the sheet and completely remake it. The advantage of the method is that often make a new page faster than edit the same. However, in this case, you have to coordinate all new data with related departments, which delays the process.
The adding algorithm is as follows:
If the number of changes are small or neglected, you can use the source sheet. In this way in this way:
Also, the amendments must be made to a list of common data. The recording is fixed in the notes (the amendment number is prescribed, reducing the deputy. Or meas.). Changes in the general data sheet are not reflected in the registration sheet.
The initial goal of the project examination is to obtain a construction permission. However, in some cases, one expertise is not enough, therefore it is necessary to conduct a re-verification:
These amendments may be associated with:
Thus, the amendments themselves can be made as forced to (when discharged and obtaining a negative sentence of expertise), and voluntarily (project adjustment). However, the re-examination will be needed both in that and in another case.
Application for examination can be an unlimited number of times. The procedure for their conduct of the same - experts check those parts of the documents where the amendments were made, as well as the compatibility of this documentation with the other parts of the project, which were previously checked.
To submit an application, the customer provides such a package of documents:
The project is considered on time (up to 60 calendar days), as a result, a positive or negative conclusion is issued. At the same time, experts may request the re-examination of the entire project, and not just those documents in which edits were made. This is possible if certain changes have been held from the moment of the previous check in the legislation, which also applies to the requirements for project documentation.
In this case, the customer has 3 options:
Obviously, it is the last option that is most desirable from the point of view of the costs of funds and time for a new consideration. The probability of the error of experts is small, therefore, it is quite difficult to appeal the result in court or the ministry. Usually, not only refinement is prescribed in the resolution, but also to eliminate them. At the same time, paper documents are not provided in cases where the entry of edits is possible without them.
Project changes are any corrections, exceptions or add data to the document transferred to the customer without changing its designation. In this case, it is not allowed to change anything in the calculations - if necessary, a new project is issued with a new designation. Corrections are entered into the original design documentation.
Changes in project documentation are carried out after making changes to make changes, the form of which is given in GOST R 21.1101-2013. The permit is approved by the head or other authorized person of the organization that has developed the project. For each document to be corrected, a separate resolution is drawn up (except in cases where the same type changes are made in several documents).
The full rules for making changes to project documentation on paper and digital media are given in GOST R 21.1101-2013.
It is necessary or not to make changes to the project documentation, will show a non-state examination. Order it in the "National Center for Experts" by placing an application on this page.
Amendments to the past examination project documentationmay be required due to various reasons. At the same time, in some cases, re-expert work on the project is mandatory. All questions and nuances of making changes to project documentation and examination will be secondary, consider in this article.
Adjusting adjustments to project documentation after receiving a positive summary of experts - the situation is quite common. So, paragraph 7 of Art. 52 Town Planning Code directly prescribes to make the corresponding corrections in the project if inconsistencies have been found in the parameters from the theoretical data of the project documentation. Otherwise, the discrepancies in these projects and the parameters of the actually built object will not allow subsequently to arrange documents for the building.
In accordance with paragraph 15 of Art. 48 of the same code, after making the adjustment to the project documentation before its approval, the developer or customer should send a project to the examination. However, paragraph 3 of Art. 49 contains some exceptions and establishes that expert work on project documents is not required if:
Only the same, only from another angle of view, it is also said in paragraph 44 of the Government Decisions of 05.03.2.2007 No. 145. In this rule, the Resolution is prescribed to the secondary project documentation, who has received a positive expert opinion, previously, was prescribed, if the amendments touched technical solutions affecting the constructive reliability and safety of the facility of the facility.
At the same time, in paragraph 44 of Resolution No. 145 for the customer or the developer, it remains to choose the passage of re-examination of the corrected project, if the essence of the modification allows the re-examination without passing. That is, in this case, the customer or developer may, at their own request, to pass the examination of the project documentation again.
Expert analysis of project documentation is initially carried out in order to obtain permission to build an object and begin the actual building with the implementation of all legislative and bureaucratic requirements.
But there are situations when after the passage of the expert study requires a re-examination.
Do not know your rights?
Thus, it can be seen that in any case the need to carry out another expertise of project documentation arises due to changes to it. Only in the first version these changes are forced, due to previous errors or inaccuracies, which caused the negative conclusion of the examination. In the second same case, the amendments are voluntary, due to any external circumstances or correction of a project associated with the objective use of theoretical data in the practical construction of a specific object.
So, the most important question that needs to be solved by the developer or customer who makes adjustments to the project documentation that has passed positive expertise is whether the implanted technical solutions affect the design reliability and safety of the object? That is, actually conclude the need for another expert analysis of project documentation.
Order of the Ministry of Regional Development of Russia No. 624 dated December 30, 2009, a list of types of works affecting the safety of facilities of caption was approved. The document is quite detailed and therefore volumetric. Types of work are divided into 3 sections:
In addition, a significant part of the types of work within the framework of its section is divided into subspecies. So, for example, preparatory work on construction, reconstruction and overhaul (p. 2 Section 3 List) include 4 subspecies:
Such a detailed listing allows you to avoid any doubts about the involvement of the amendments made to the project to adjust the work affecting the safety of the facility of the facility, and therefore the need for another project examination.
In accordance with paragraph 44 of Resolution No. 145, the re-examination may be carried out an unlimited number of times (2 or more). At the same time, each subsequent examination is carried out in the order that is provided for by law for conducting primary statespertization. Meanwhile, the experts will be assessed:
Thus, for re-examination, the Customer must provide a package of documents on the list specified in paragraph 13 of the Regulations approved by Resolution No. 145, including:
It should be borne in mind that the project can be considered on the re-examination of the whole, if from the moment of the primary or past re-examination, the legislation has amended, affecting the results of the state system.
If the project documentation received a negative conclusion according to the results of the work of experts, then in paragraph 10 of Art. 49 Town Planning Code are offered 2 solution options:
In practice, since still experts are rarely mistaken, and the trial - the case is not cheap and long, it's easier and more efficiently add to the draft amendment on comments and pass the examination again. Moreover, the provision on the examination, approved by Resolution No. 145, contains the norm allowing not to return to the applicant submitted to the examination documents in paper, if eliminating comments, caused a negative conclusion, possibly without refunding the documentation. In this case, the applicant's deficienation is given a certain period of deficiencies, at the end of which it should provide in an expert organization that part of the project documentation that has been subject to change and a certificate describing the amendments made.
Thus, the corrected project documentation requires re-examination, both in compulsory and at the request of the developer. At the same time, it is very important not to miss the moment, correctly evaluate the changes made to project documents and re-examine that the law requires, otherwise it is later possible to make greater difficulties with a documentary design of the constructed facility.
GOST R 21.1101-2013 Basic requirements for project and working documentation
The objectives and principles of standardization in the Russian Federation are established by the Federal Law of December 27, 2002 No. 184-FZ "On Technical Regulation", and the rules for the application of national standards of the Russian Federation - GOST R 1.0-2004 "Standardization in the Russian Federation. Outdoor positions ยป
Information about the standard GOST R 21.1101-2013
3.2 Abbreviations
GOST R 21.1101-2013 "The basic requirements for project and working documentation" used the following reductions:
DE. - electronic document;
ESKD - Unified system of design documentation; CAD-System (Systems) of automated design;
SPDS - System of design documents for construction;
SED - system (system) of electronic document management.
Can the project / working documentation (copies of sheets), developed by one organization, on behalf of the developer, make changes to another organization on a copy of the sheets of the former organization?
Is it necessary to make changes in the main stamp in this case (a new stamp of a new organization and new signatures)?
What items and standards in the SPDS system or other legislation indicate the procedure for making changes to someone else's project documentation?
The description of the situation has arisen: The developer ordered the development of a residential apartment building in the project organization / IP. The project organization has developed project documentation and handed over to the developer (a copy in accordance with GOST). The developer at present received a positive sentence of expertise on the object of capital construction. Next, the developer decided to make changes (adjustment) in the previously developed project documentation, with re-access to expertise, but he applied to another project organization.
Thus, the "new project organization" should make changes to the sheets of books / volumes / sections that are available from the developer, and these are copies of sheets from the previous organization with the main stamp and the signatures of the previous organization?
Or is the "New Design Organization" obliged all sheets of books / volumes / partitions to overturn and already printed under their stamp, with their employees and necessary changes?
How to be if the developer only orders the adjustment of some sections (individual sheets) and some of the sheets are not subject to adjustment.
The "new project organization" insists that it will make adjustments only in individual sheets and only they will issue a separate volume.
Or maybe a new project organization to make changes to the letter-order (agreement) to the documentation that they did not develop and leave the stamps of the former organization, that is, not to indicate their company and persons who have made changes?
In fact, the developer was transferred to the section (for example kr etc.), where the details of the "new project organization" are indicated on the title page, and as part of the books, part of the sheets are invested by the previous organization. At the same time, changes were made on sheets of the former organization and there is no record in the stamp that these changes are already made by the "new project organization".
The leadership of the "new project organization" causes this by the fact that they should not be responsible for incorrect or erroneous technical solutions for other issues and in this regard, only part of the sheets from the entire book correct.
But on the fact of re-examination, the developer carries not separate adjusted sheets, but a whole book "KR". And here the expertise should ask why the sheets in one book are signed by different organizations?
Earlier in 2008, a similar question was raised and there was an explanation, but you will not make clear conclusions:
Collection of explanations on pre-project and project preparation of construction (questions and answers) *** (according to Regulation No. 87) Issue 2 Moscow 2008.
23. Does the right to organize control over construction, together with the Customer to agree on changes in project documentation without the participation of the Organization, which has developed the project?
According to clause 4.1, the joint venture 11-110-99 "Author's supervision for the construction of buildings and structures" is an author's supervision, if it is fulfilled by a legal entity, is carried out by specialist developers of working documentation. In accordance with GOST 21.101-97, "Project documentation System for Construction. The main requirement for project and working documentation "" Changing the working paper previously issued to the Customer "is carried out on the basis of permission approved by the developer's organization manager (paragraph 7.1, subparagraph 7.4.1), which is responsible for the inconsistency of these changes to the technical regulations in accordance with provisions of Article 60 of the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation. In the event of force majeure circumstances (the liquidation of the developer organization, the imposition of arrest on it with the financial insolvency and the impossibility in connection with this to fulfill its functions, etc.) Certificate supervision, and, consequently, making changes to working documentation, It may be assigned to the contractual principles of an organization that has the right to fulfill the indicated works, which under the contract must take all the obligations of the designer contractor associated with the technical decisions adopted in the draft and established by Article 760 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. It should be taken note that part 3 of Article 49 of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation established: "The state examination of project documentation is not carried out in the event that for construction, reconstruction, overhaul is not required to obtain a construction permit, as well as in the case of such an examination With regard to project documentation of capital construction facilities that received a positive conclusion of state examination and applied (hereinafter referred to as standard documentation), or modifying such project documentation that does not affect the constructive and other characteristics of the reliability and safety of capital construction objects. " Therefore, in case the changes made to the project documentation do not affect the constructive and other characteristics of the reliability and safety of the facility, the presence of a decision of an organization that has mastered the responsibilities of the developer's organization decorated in accordance with the requirements of GOST 2101-97 may serve as a basis for implementation Construction of the object. In other cases, i.e. If the changes relate to constructive and other characteristics of reliability and security, a state examination of recycled project documentation is required and its reducing in the prescribed manner.
